Miles Costello and Angela Jameson
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
A lobby group for the City's most powerful fund managers has issued its most serious "red top" alert on Barclays' £7 billion capital-raising plans, despite several last-minute concessions made by the bank.
The red top notice issued by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) underscores its "grave concern" at how Barclays has treated its longstanding investors.
Institutional shareholders believe that Barclays has given preferential terms to two Middle Eastern investors in exchange for £5.8 billion worth of capital.
Qatar Holding LLC is investing £2.3 billion in the UK bank and Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan is injecting £3.5 billion.
While today’s alert from the ABI is not a recommendation that shareholders vote against the proposals, it is widely interpreted as such by London's investment community. It represents a significant hardening of the ABI's stance. Last week, it issued an amber alert, pending discussions with the bank on Friday.
Barclays today offered a sop to angry investors by persuading the two Middle East investors to give up £500 million worth of reserve capital instruments in the bank and make them available to institutional shareholders.
At the same time, Barclays said that its entire board would "exceptionally offer themselves" for re-election in April next year, and confirmed that its executive directors would not be paid any bonuses for 2008.
Bob Diamond, president of Barclays Capital, was Barclays' best paid executive last year, receiving £21 million in cash and shares. This year he will receive his basic salary of just £250,000, which is unchanged since January 1999.
However, the City balked at today’s concessions, sending shares in Barclays down more than 8 per cent, or 14p, to 140.5p.
The bank said this morning that it has held meetings with shareholders, describing the discussions as "constructive", adding: "The board of Barclays has listened carefully to shareholders' views."
But commenting on today’s changes, one of the bank's big institutional shareholders, said: "This is the price for not voting the deal down but it's a complete nonsense..
"Barclays could hardly have seriously considered paying executive bonuses this year but most shareholders don't think that this is about remuneration, it's about the right to take part on the same terms."
Another said: "I can't really see how anything has changed. They haven't actually given shareholders the same exposure. They have stripped out the warrants and there are no fees attached."
Over the next couple of days, institutional investors will be contacted by brokers to see if they want to buy any of the £500 million worth of reserve capital instruments, which are special shares that carry a high interest rate of 14 per cent.
It is understood that if demand from investors outstrips the £500 million on offer, the Middle East investors will not make any more reserve capital instruments available. Instead, the sum will be divided up on a pro rata basis between those shareholders who want to buy the shares.
Peter Montagnon, the ABI's director of investment affairs, said: "Shareholders will have to weigh up all the relevant factors, including the consequences of rejection for Barclays and the wider banking system.
"The board should not therefore assume that votes in favour of the proposal constitute support for the way it has approached the issue.
"The red top establishes a firm basis of principle for further dialogue with Barclays and other companies in future."
The alert means Barclays has until the end of this week to consider reworking its capital-raising plans for a second time or risk a potential catastrophic revolt by its owners. Shareholders vote on the fundraising on Monday.
Barclays was criticised for shunning the Bank of England's £37 billion bailout of high street banks last month, in favour of raising funds from Middle Eastern investors. Critics said the cost of the finance, effectively at an interest rate of 14 per cent, put a high price on independence from the Government.
Analysts reckon the extra cost of the Middle Eastern capital-raising, when compared with the Government's offer, amounts to £3 billion.
The moment your toes touch the sand and your gaze meets water, you know you’re in the Bahamas.
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
£28k+ Basic + Commission
Drummond Selection
London
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Small shareholders have been diluted by the fund raising and the bribe to institutions. The principle of pre emption is important and institutions should look after small shareholders as well as themselves. Giving up bonuses is laughable - they should not be paid until the share price exceeds its hi
N Reed, London, UK
Remenber this Board nearly paid £45bn for Amro, if that deal had gone through it would have being getting bought by RBS. The bank is being given away , at 14% I would have a bit of secured notes. Vote against
Ian, London,
The "Only Thing this will Preserve is "Their Job's & Bonus's""! The Shareholder's should "Boot them Out"!
paul, Manchester, Uk
As a small shareholder,we are voting no next week.My how nice it would have been for OAP's faced with falling incomes, to have had the opportunity to earn a fat 14% coupon.We need a new board.Any volunteers,pls send your name to Robert Peston at the BBC,so that we can have an alternative slate ready
J. Haddon, London, UK
And what about private investors and small shareholders.The Chairman should step down now and Varley and Diamond be replaced along with others involved in this shameful giveaway of a major British Institution and destruction of shareholders savings
Michael, Lindfield,
£21m cash in '07! I'd hedge on Bob Diamond not given a flaming monkey whether he gets a bonus this year, or the years to come. He's hedged his accumulated bonuses of the past decade of growth at Capital safely under his mattress. He could live off interest (£21m*4% saving rate) for some time.
Anon, Stroud, UK
As a non-institutional investor in Barclays, I'm uterly disgusted at the way executive management is treating exisiting small shareholders by not allowing them to participate in the capital raising scheme. I for one will be voting against the current boards' re-election next April.
Roger, London,
Too little too late. Pity we can't get rid of the top execs today.
John, Cape Town, South Africa
Where is the regulator ? Why are small shareholders not permitted to participate ? THIS IS A DISGRACE.
L.Robins, London, UK
Barclays took over Thomas Cook and BHS cards. Existing card holders were refused by 'not scoring highly enough'. It's Barclays that don't score highly enough rather! A sign of their state of affairs! Unless interest was paid on the card Barclays couldn't afford the card holder. No customers=no bank!
LY, Edinburgh, UK
Barclays is trying to buy off the powerful. Small shareholders are further diluted by this. Small shareholders should move their accounts in protest.
N Reed, London, UK