I am sceptical about the ability of a computer to spot my Mr Darcy. I am also an online dating virgin.

However, being on the wrong side of 30 and single, a little matchmaking help, even from an algorithm, would not go amiss.

I embark on the 258-question psychometric test (thankful it's been whittled down from the original one of more than 400).

On a scale of one to six I have to rate, among a slew of statements, the degree to which:

my house is cleaner when I have people coming over;

I sometimes waste time when I should be working (yes, if I count filling in online psychometric tests);

I do not give as much to charity as I can afford (shamefully true);

I am even-tempered at all times (not on deadline or when cleaning my house).

I struggle to find relevant “living skills” from a list of 35 that includes long-term personal planning, co-ordinating household schedules, managing my finances, creating a peaceful and beautiful home and maintaining an organised life.

Disappointingly, after almost two hours, my final profile reads a bit like a horoscope: broad enough to apply to anyone. Key points include:

sometimes curious, sometimes content;

sometimes outgoing, sometimes reserved;

sometimes steady, sometimes responsive.

Insightful? No. There is a lot more detail but none of it is really me. To my surprise (because I have not signed up for the paid service), eHarmony has already found me some matches. Seven to be precise. I have seven possible soulmates! I am quite excited. Could this be it? Could 15 years of dating finally be coming to an end? If so, thank you algorithm!

Times Recommends

• US jobs plunge in worst fall since 1974
• Brown will press banks to pass on full rate cut
• Woolworths axes 450 staff amid firesale