Alice Miles
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
Suddenly 2012 sounds a lot less enticing. The year in which Britain was to have been triumphant, basking in international Olympic glory, will be the year when the debt hits home. In schools and hospitals and social services departments, in libraries and nurseries and courts, 2012 will be the year that high times turn to hard times.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimated yesterday that the country faces spending cuts of £19 billion in 2012-13. Cabinet ministers have already begun fighting over who takes the hit. The unemployed, the homeless, the destitute will join the athletes parading through London.
It will be payback time, big time. In 2011-12 the tax increases strike: the 45p top rate, the rise in national insurance. In 2012 national debt is forecast to reach the magic £1 trillion. And in 2012 we throw billions of pounds at the Olympics.
Oh, that we could cancel them instead. We obviously cannot afford them any more.
The Olympics budget has soared from an original guesstimate of £2.7 billion, winner of the gold medal for kite-flying, to £9.3 billion, and will rise further: there is as yet no clear security plan, the issue that was the biggest cause of cost overruns in Sydney and Athens. Only £500 million is still unspoken for in the £2.7 billion contingency fund, and there are four years still to go.
This month Tessa Jowell, the Minister for the Games, admitted that the Government would not have bid for them if it had seen what was coming. “Had we known what we know now, would we have bid for the Olympics? Almost certainly not.”
Mirroring Gordon Brown's big spending plans and fiscal stimulus, Ms Jowell now describes the money being thrown at the Games as a “counter-cyclical investment”.
A counter-cyclical investment? In more than 1,000 full-time officials and consultants (and rising), claiming salaries of up to £620,000 each? In 72 civil servants at the Olympic executive? A counter-cyclical £500 million athletics stadium that nobody knows how to use afterwards? Wembley Stadium would have sufficed. Is it a counter-cyclical investment in the £1.5 billion media centre plus thousands of homes in an Olympic village that the Government will struggle to sell afterwards? Very counter-cyclical, especially since the PFI deal collapsed in the credit crunch, leaving the Government to pick up the tab to keep the building work going at all.
Consultants called into conduct a review last week recommended scrapping the wholly unnecessary, temporary, £40 million, 6,000-seat stadium in Greenwich for badminton and rhythmic gymnastics. But they saved the £60 million basketball arena, considered by Alistair Darling, the Chancellor himself, a complete waste of money. “Can't we have this in some old shed?” he once asked Olympics officials, not counter-cyclically, perhaps, but counter-intuitively. No, they replied: US TV audiences demand a shiny place.
I have another question: why can't we have this in Beijing? All the expensive stadiums are already there and the Games have been moved before: in 1906 the decision was taken to move the 1908 Olympics from Rome to London after Mount Vesuvius erupted and the Italians needed the money to rebuild Naples.
Now the world financial system has erupted, and we need the money to help to rebuild the economy, not a dozen deserted stadiums and thousands of empty homes. The wave of energy created by the collision of sport, media and international marketing has taken on a life of its own, outside the control of mere ministers: £25 million on a shooting gallery here, a 23,000-seat arena for horse riding there. Why can't they get a train to Hickstead?
An “economic stabilisation programme”, Ms Jowell now calls the Games. Before that they were a regeneration programme for East London, remember? They were never just a whole lot of money thrown at a big, stupid party.
And what does the International Olympic Committee, those weirdly untouchable gods of sport, have to say? As Mr Darling explained to the nation how it was going to slip into a trillion pounds of debt on Monday, the President of the IOC, Jacques Rogge, came to London to give a pep talk on the Olympics. It was, as befits the head of an organisation that operates somewhere beyond the real world, a totally surreal speech.
I think he was trying to suggest that the “positive legacy” need not be the great (empty) stadiums, but “new opportunities” - more investment in organised sport and fewer fatties, especially young ones. We do not need a £9.3 billion Olympics to wish for that.
Mr Rogge's speech flitted all over the place before he got to the credit crunch, stuck on the end as an afterthought. “I am conscious that we come out of the enormous success of Beijing into difficult economic times,” he said. “Well, the Games have survived difficult times before... The Games remind us that the transient difficulties of life can be overcome through hard work and determination.” Funny, that's exactly what small businesses owners, their employees, their families, watching a lifetime's work collapse today, wouldn't say.
“The Games show that excellence, friendship and respect have no limits. That wars, economic downturns, natural disasters and violent attacks do not dissuade or dishearten humanity.” Diddly-diddly doo.
Anyone would think Mr Rogge did not know they cancelled the Games in the First and Second World Wars. Even the head of the IOC press commssion admitted this week that Brtiain faces “the toughest time short of wartime to get the project to 2012”.
But it was in his peroration that the IOC President soared to heights of new Labourish vacuity not reached since - actually, not since Ms Jowell's heyday and a particularly memorable speech that she once delivered on “our national cultural identity”, the ties that bind the British (interestingly, sport was not among them, then)...
Just when we thought new Labour dead, those empty phrases, the trite generalisations, the belief that as long as you said something, it really didn't matter if it didn't make any sense... over to Mr Rogge.
“Because while not all of us can be an Olympian, the simple joy of running faster, leaping higher or throwing further makes all of us equal, brings us together, and places each of us firmly in the world. Not apart from it. Thank you.”
Ah. Feeling better?

Alice Miles has been with The Times since 1999. She began as a Parliamentary Sketch writer before becoming a columnist, writing mainly on politics and national issues such as education and health. She won Columnist of the Year in 2007.
The moment your toes touch the sand and your gaze meets water, you know you’re in the Bahamas.
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
£28k+ Basic + Commission
Drummond Selection
London
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
We should have subcontracted the whole thing to the Chinese or the Greeks, both of whom made a good job of their Olympics.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
You complain about it when you have it, then complain when you don't have it. A nation of whingers, best demonstrated by its opinion columns. Instead of cancelling the great event that is the Olympic Games, how about cancelling that war in Iraq? That should pay for it, with change left over.
George Haig Brewster, New York City, USA
A whole new approach to budgeting is required, "zero-base", where only programmes essential to the British people,s welfare will survive. So farewell to the Olympics, Trident, Iraq/Afghanistan, ID cards, databases and all such ministerial vanity projects
Beau, Glasgow,, Scotland
Yes. By all means cancel the 2012 Olympics in London.
RalphG, New Malden,
Scrap them , apart from the cost, they are a great security risk and opportunity for the nutcase terrorists to create havoc in London.
Living in London near one of the venues I am very apprehensive for my family.
Whose idiotic idea was it to have them here anyway?
David, London,
I am 40 years old and never ever watched any of the Olympics and 2012 London will be no exception.
I'm only a wooley-back from Derbyshire and will not make the slightest bit of difference to my life at all.
Andy, Chesterfield, England
Alice, if you've read 'The Lords of the Rings' or 'The New Lords of the Rings', you'd want nothing at all to do with the Olympics! It might not even be the 'whole truth' but what there is is awful.
Ash, Cape Town, South Africa
David is quite correct, the consultants are called in to conduct a review. Not 'the consultants are called into conduct etc'. Into is for things like 'come into the house, it's freezing outside'.
Ash, Cape Town, South Africa
How typically British. A lot of countries were clamouring to get the Olympics and would be honoured to have it, yet we finally get it and then we complain.
Bayo, London,
I suggest the opening ceremony consists of a young girl, holding a sparkler.
The rest of the games can be found in various sites around London.
Swimming in the Leyton Pool. Rowing on the Thames, Archery in Epping Forest. Riding in Epping Forest.
Running,from Hoodies in East London on a Friday night
Carrie, London,
Dear Steve of Aberdeen,
David's right. It should be 'Consultants called in to conduct a review'. Not into.
Val, Canada
Val Hamblin, Hamilton, Ont, Canada
If you want Keynesian pump priming via public works surely the expenditure on the infrastructure associated with the Olympics is just the ticket?
Ian Stuart, Frederick, USA
Let those who want it pay. I don't and I don't want my taxes used for this tiresome waste of time.
C Smith, Norwich, UK
just to be pedantic, David, but the article is actually correct with "into"
Steve, aberdeen,
Alice Miles is absolutely right. So much money spent on a few weeks of sports is sad. And the sporting venues will lack the financing to maintain. Does no one remember the Millenium Dome? Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should ring fence their taxes to exclude Olympic spending.
mike, london, uk
Deal with it, we're hosting it and it'll be wonderful. What a bunch of pessimistic naysayers you lot are. Why not try being positive for a change? Recessions happen, the world doesn't and shouldn't stop for them. So wonderful to see that the British national sport (moaning) is still thriving.
John, London, UK
I completely agree Alice. I am quite happy for other taxpayers to enjoy things I'm not interested in as long as we can afford them but now when times are tight I think we should focus on the essentials. Building a new facility for the games every 4 years is pure profigacy
Michael, Bromley, UK
I was visiting the UK when the decision was announced , the euphoria and hysteria were quite the silliest I have ever witnessed by supposedly adult intelligent people. The sooner someone over there has the courage and sense to bin them the better otherwise watch out brit taxpayers!
gordon, auckland, new zealand
I don't understand the resentment and bitterness of people who don't want to have the Olympics in London. So much hard work has gone into bringing the greatest spectacle on earth to Britain. Cheer up! It's a party and you're all invited! Why is there is so much self inflicted misery in this country?
Rob, London, UK
Why not, just hold your olympics here, If you pay the green fee of those empty stadium. We are happy for that
Nell, Beijing, China
I'm from Sydney and as much as I enjoyed the spectacle of the Olympics it has been a financial mess for the State of NSW. I wouldn't pretend to be an expert on just why our State's finances are poorer than any other state in Australia but my suspicions are that this event is partially to blame.
Peter, Sydney, Australia
Don't want 'em, never wanted em', will never want 'em. What will the North get out of this? Nowt that's what. Let London pay for what London gets. While we're at it, why did the Cockneys get the national soccer stadium when they only have one decent team (Arsenal) to the nine in the North?
Bob, Liverpool, England
They had a dandy Olympics in Los Angeles in 1984 and it didn't cost a dime. Peter Ueberroth ran it in such a way that it paid for itself. Try that. Not only would it keep the Olympics in London, it might teach everyone a thing or two about living within their means.
Daniel J. Houghton, New York City, USA
Yes, please rid us of the Olympics.
Sedgwick, London, UK
" US tv audiences demand a shiny place" ? Hardly. We could not care less about the venue. It's the competition , not a "shiny" floor . Someone is trying to pull the wool over your collective eyes. Sounds like a colossal waste of $ to me.
mjkane, chicago, usa
Alice Miles for 2009 Nobel Prize for Economics
Alice Van der Bester, London,
Reading these articles, i have begun to understand why the Bristish empire have gone with the wind.
Keats , Shanghai,
My 5 year old announced last evening that he had learned the difference between "Wants and Needs" at school yesterday. Under needs, he listed, "Food, shelter, water, air". Under wants, he declared, " Ice skates, toys, and enough money to pay for your family's needs." Brilliant.
Joanne, BC, Canada
What a ridiculous article. Stop with the comment seeking pessimism.
If we can afford Iraq, we can afford the Olympics. Some benefits cannot be measured in pounds.
Chris, Bristol,
The olympics itself is a swindle. It is no longer about the sport, but about the advertising deals and the money. It needs to go back to its simple roots. And they need to cut back on some of the unpopular events.
blah, ny, us
I've said from the start that we should never have bid for the games. The budget forecast is now three times over the starting figure so the final cost will greatly exceed even the estimate given above (£20 billion). This might not seem a lot compared to the bank bail-out but 'every little counts'.
Stuart, Beccles, UK
I knew as soon as it was announced that it wasn't a great idea... another fantastic present left by Toni the Great, together with the Iraq war, the collapse of the financial markets and the housing bubble.
Anna, Leeds, UK
No William Garret, complaining about £9.3 billion being taken from £1.9 trillion spread over the next 4 years = insanity.
Lawrence, Salisbury, United Kingdom
Or Paris - revenge for the CAP
Philip C, Wallingford, Oxon
It's a strange thing but those of my friends and colleagues who cheered when London beat Paris and got the Olympics can't now seem to remember having done so !
James, London, UK
£9.3 billion for three weeks of sport = insanity
William Garrett, Harrow,
In many replies to Times articles, I've said that the Olympics should be cancelled. We can't afford them - financially or morally in the current climate. To spend over £10 billion on a two-week athletic binge is just totally obscene when there are going to be many people made homeless by 2012.
Ian Dickson, Brighton, UK
Dear Lord, no! Leave our poor city alone.
Tom, Beijing,
As an ex-Brit living in Athens who witnessed the profligacy of the 2004 Athens Games, and is still paying for it, I warned you all back home to give it a miss in 2012. Now I'll be paying for both for the rest of my life since I also pay UK taxes. Worse still, I didn't watch one event in 2004!
Dr DavidGreen, Athens, Greece
The majority of people will watch the Olympics on TV, so why waste money on expensive stadia with huge spectator capacities?
Never mind what US TV demands for basketball. Put the the event in a disused aircraft hangar. It will still be boring wherever it is located.
Tom Williams, Oxford, Oxon
Why on earth they don't build a permanent location in Greece, and each country can host it in turn.
alex, forres, uk
The sensible thing would be to move them to some place where they just love pointless money wasting on useless infrastructure, Dubai comes to mind.
I'm sure they'd appreciate being given the chance to build the biggest most obnoxious stadiums ever seen, the UK just can't afford this Olympic circus.
luca, turin, italy
Show me where to sign up for cancellation of this mistake, or should it be viewed as a keynesian 'hole in the ground'?
Also - well spotted david trewick!
Chris, Reading,
I cannot believe we are still going ahead with this nonsense.
Steve, Bournemouth,
The OLYMPICS belong to the GREEKS they already have the means to present the 2012 merry go round.
Tony, Derby, UK
Seems like a good candidate for a petition on the Number 10 website to me.
Tony, London,
They are still paying for them in Greece. But don't worry they lots of empty stadiums to compensate.
Rex Lester, Surbiton, Uk
the london olympics are no more a pointless waste of money now that at inception. just be grateful we won't have to see ken "did I mention how wonderful I am? (p.s. advert paid for by you)" livingstone's face. although there will still be the bitterness and complaints about boris, of course.
jem, london, uk
maybe we could auction the olympics to the highest bidder
steph, london,
Give the Olympic Games to Qatar.
They successfully hosted the Asian Games in Doha two years ago, and have the infrastructure, the money, and - most importantly - the will, to build anything required to house the events not yet catered for.
And they already have an Athlete's Village...
Phil, Doha, Qatar,
Brilliant idea! Why not have them in China? Does it really matter any more where they are? National pride? What rubbish, we are BROKE and by 2012 we will be really broke so how can we possibly justify them and what has to be sacrificed to pay for them? Hospitals? Schools? Welfare?
maggie, Castle Cary, UK
Ms Jowell should be hanging her head for so shamelessly misleading us about the cost of this project. It was clear form the beginning that the 'budgetary forecasts' were just a wild shot in the dark.
This is just a self-promotion exercise for some public figures, playing games with our money.
Gordon, Liuzhou, China
The Olympics were not the cause of the current economic crisis. I would have thought that against the huge cost of bailing out the banks, the Olympics would now seem like a bargain.
If you were able to recoup every penny and donate it to the treasury, it would still be just a drop in the ocean.
Nick, Grayshott,
very good idea. china already has all the stadiums, has escaped most of the credit cruch, and uk athletes did very well there.
ade alade, london, uk
The Olympics is our only chance to get people believing in Britain again, encourage our own and foreign investment and help drag us up off the floor. Surely some of the Govt spend your way out of trouble money can be used to invest, athletes accommodation designed for hospital use after for example
David, Tianjin, China
Great article. Now, how to spell it out to those in charge? Preferably in words of two syllables or one syllable:
We. Don't. Need. It. We Can't. Afford. It.
Should be fairly understandable, one would think.
T Austin, London,
Alice is spot on today! From the moment it was announced, I said it would cost this country £20 billion in the end and I still think I will be proved right.
In the context of the whole community, we just can't afford this.
Matthew Wetmore, Halesworth,
How tiresome.
Those who want us to give up the Olympics have been against them from the start. They are just miserable and mean spirited.
Andrew, London,
Estimates of (Lord) Coe's income and expenses from this jamboree are said to exceed £2million.
Can this be true?
Peter Lewin, Northwood, UK
This is a great opportunity to collapse the Olympics into what they were the last time they were held in London (1948) i.e. something sensible. Use whatever venues already exist, let participants sort out their own accommodation and transport and treat it like what it should be: just a bit of fun.
Stewart, Beijing,
We couldn't afford the Games before the credit crunch - our government exists in Cloud Cuckoo Land...
Amanda, London,
I was against the Olympics from the start. Waste of money and you certainly couldn't trust this government to be honest with the initial cost.
By the way, just to be pedantic:
'Consultants called into conduct a review last week...' into should be in to.
David Trewick, Luton, England
I fully agree with this very good article. There is no need for Olympics in London in 2012. We should tell the IOC we can't afford it and we'll even give it for free to anybody interested (Paris, Dubai, etc...). Maybe we should have a petition online calling for the cancellation of the Olympics?
Ahmad, Tunbridge Wells, UK
What a miserable article!
Toby, London, UK