Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
Recycling is a cause which few, if any, will speak against. It is widely acknowledged to be a good thing. The difficulty comes in trying to get citizens and companies to practise what they preach. David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, deserves some credit, therefore, for his attempts to raise consciousness.
The emphasis on waste prevention is especially welcome. Big strides will be taken in October when previously announced obligations on industrial and commercial waste makers, who generate three quarters of the total, come into force.
It is a mistake, however, to assume that the recycling of household waste will be helped if local authorities levy charges on individuals. Mr Miliband is adamant that the financial penalties that might be incurred do not equate to taxes because no extra revenue would be raised, either for central or local government. At the same time, he is not making the mechanism mandatory. It is only enabling local authorities to use the financial penalties if they want to. Yet whatever the nomenclature, the charges will be seen as a tax.
Goodwill is the greatest ally of recycling and, since tax has such unpleasant associations, the fees will besmirch the popularity of recycling. Besides, the administration of any such system will create painful and expensive headaches. Neither local nor central government is noted for bureaucratic efficiency. Debt collection would be complex. Measuring waste will be more troublesome.
Local authorities that use the new powers to levy fines will quickly find out whether they are workable. If they fail, and they will fail if they are unpopular, proponents will be punished at the next election. The uproar might invigorate local democracy, just as the outpourings against fortnightly rubbish clearance invigorated local politics. But it will do nothing to enhance recycling.
The implications for public hygiene and public order cannot be forgotten. Fly-tipping will become more prevalent if household budgets are threatened. More refuse will end up on the side of country roads while disorderly personal disputes will arise between neighbours suspicious of unfair or unauthorised use of dustbins.
Although thoughts of fines on householders is wrongheaded, money does come into the recycling equation. Mr Miliband must answer questions about who will pay for the 124 pages of initiatives published yesterday. Huge benefits, meanwhile, will come if the profit motive is yoked to the cause of recycling. At present, a tiny £1 billion (equivalent to about 0.1 per cent of national income) of rubbish is recycled per year. If volumes rise, so will the economies of scale, and recycling will become more profitable and more self-sustaining. At present, waste collection companies recover some of their costs selling recycled materials. The market in recycled paper, benefiting from a broad network of intermediaries buzzing between waste paper collectors and reusers of recycled raw material, is relatively sophisticated. Trading in recycled metals, thanks to their relative value, is pretty efficient too. But the markets in different recycled materials are far from uniform. Trade in recycled plastics, for example, is primitive.
Recycling volumes will rise most quickly if the Government smooths the path of those who make a living from reuse and reclamation. There is no place yet for fining or taxing those individuals yet to appreciate the benefits of an afterlife for their rubbish.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Seems like a lot of rubbish to me. Charges on rubbish collection are to make up the shortfall in lost cigarette revinue to the treasury now that less people are smoking.
yoric, leeds,
In our inner-city area, consisting mostly of large houses divided into flats with no space for bins, the council provide large bins on every street which are emptied several times a day, and most people therefore deposit small quantities of rubbish on a regular basis. We also have recycling bins nearby. Although we do have a regular doorstep rubbish collection, this is rarely used by most households in my street, while the weekly doorstep recycling collection is used by the majority. How will our rubbish output be quantified when we all put it into the communal bin in bags in relatively small quantities ? And how can we be forced to keep several different sorts of waste and recycling in flats ? In all the coverage I have seen no mention of how this could work for flat-dwellers with limited space - wheelie-bins are certainly not an option !
Sarah, London,
The recyling message has to be adopted by local government employees. As a business we tried for many months to obtain the recyling bins, only to be consistently told that we didnt qualify because we were a business.
Business recyling bins were however available but at a cost in excess of the costs involved in refuse collection, making recycling a more expensive option than just dumping the rubbish in the normal bins.
Eventaully we managed to convince our local authority that we should have "free" recycling bins as were are a residentail and nursing home (our "business" being providing homes for those in need of care). Until local authorities embrace recycling it will remain pointless.
It is a common sight to see carefully sorted waste being tipped into a communal refuse lorry !!
Tony, Oxon,
Without doubt the most thought less plan floating out there. Our bins are picked up every two weeks. Where I live, bins must be placed close to the home, there are maggots, encourages rodents, and the smell in the heat is disgusting. This isn't a healthy way to dispose of garbage. We recycle, only our council does not pick up bottles and various other things - such as waxed boxes. I don't own a car, so how exactly should I dispose of the things the council won't pick up?
It doesn't seem to me that the environmental secretary lives on the planet with real people. How is it helping if you assume everyone owns a car and can dispose of waste properly? If I have to bag my garbage three times in order to control the smell and invitation of creatures invading it? It is the most ridiculous of plans, fine for those who have an acre of land to put their garbage well away from their homes - not so for those of us who have to live on top of it before it gets picked up.
Layne, Southampton, Hampshire
Without doubt the most thought less plan floating out there. Our bins are picked up every two weeks. Where I live, bins must be placed close to the home, there are maggots, encourages rodents, and the smell in the heat is disgusting. This isn't a healthy way to dispose of garbage. We recycle, only our council does not pick up bottles and various other things - such as waxed boxes. I don't own a car, so how exactly should I dispose of the things the council won't pick up?
It doesn't seem to me that the environmental secretary lives on the planet with real people. How is it helping if you assume everyone owns a car and can dispose of waste properly? If I have to bag my garbage three times in order to control the smell and invitation of creatures invading it? It is the most ridiculous of plans, fine for those who have an acre of land to put their garbage well away from their homes - not so for those of us who have to live on top of it before it gets picked up.
Layne, Southampton, Hampshire
The need to recycle more is a serious issue, and most households will recycle 'stuff' given the opportunity. However the postion 'NU Labour' takes of 'Stick' to everything will alienate the very people they are trying to persuade. Giving Local Authorities powers to 'Fine' people for the 'wrong sort of rubbish', or putting their Wheelie Bins out on the "wrong day" is a complete nonsense. Some Local Authorities in the 'hustle' for all this nonsense, have decided that they wont accept 'Shredded Paper' or 'Glass'. Just what raving nonsense is that?
The Senior Managers of Cleansing Departments & Councillors better be very careful that they don't find themselves at the end of personal legal action, or complaints of a Criminal nature being lodged against them by angry Council Tax Payers. This approach of using a 'Sledgehammer' to crack a nut must NOT be tolerated one bit!!
Bob Clarke, Chelmsford, UK
Typical Labour policy of overcomplicating things. It is clear that while householders must recycle more, retailers and manufacturers must significantly reduce packaging. Instead it seems as if every day they find new ways of increasing the amount plastic and cardboard that we need to throw back in the bin. Can anybody tell me why red peppers need to be individually wrapped in plastic ? or why M&S insists on putting their bananas in a plastic bag? My answer to all of this is to go to the corner shop/market where they have fresh fruit and vegetables that I can simply drop in a paper bag. But this is not realistic for the average person. If Mr Milliband wants to show he is doing something: target the manufacturers and the retailers!
Juana, London,
We currently have weekly collections alternating between recycling and landfill bin (effectively fortnightly collection of your "normal" rubbish).
In a household of only two, this policy works quite well for us. We were surprised at how many things can be put into the recycling bin. However, it is evident that households with children (particularly nappy wearing children) find it difficult bordering on impossible to contan two weeks of non-recyclable rubbish in one wheely bin.
The most natural reaction to a charge imposed on landfill waste would be to stuff a load of non-recyclable material into the recycling bin.
To make the system work we will not only be paying someone to weigh our bins but also employing snooping inspectors to check our recyclable waste.
The sheer number of extra bodies needed to implement this solution will inevitably result in a rise in the councils costs. We will have to pay for it. Whatever the method of recovery, this cannot be "tax neutral".
Bob, Reading,
Any opportunity you give a council to make extra money will be hungrily and gratefully snapped up. Bring this in and they'll all be doing it within a year, with ever more imaginative methods of extracting yet more money from us - naive in the extreme to believe otherwise!
I can see it now... "Sorry Madam, but you put a blue coloured wrapper in the recycling bin on a Thursday, and you're well aware that section 2, sub-section 3.1(a) of the regulations states that blue can only go in on a Wednesday - that'll be £25 please"
Homer, London,