Nicola Woolcock
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
The list in full | World university ratings 2008 I School Gate: These rankings are a reason for cheer for British institutions I A Don's Life: The best universities in the world
British universities have slipped down the world rankings as they compete ever harder with eminent institutions overseas.
Cambridge and Oxford have lost ground to Harvard and Yale, while fewer British universities are in the top 200 list, published today, than last year.
At a time when it is essential for British institutions to attract lucrative international students who pay higher fees, they are being outdone increasingly by American universities that receive huge endowments.
Harvard tops the Times Higher Education-QS World University Rankings for the fifth consecutive year. Its endowment fund is greater than the total annual public funding for all universities in England.
Yale holds the second spot after being joint second with Cambridge and Oxford last year. The two British institutions came third and fourth respectively this year.
Four British universities are in the top 10, the same as last year. Imperial College London fell from fifth to sixth place while University College London rose from ninth to seventh.
In all, 17 universities in Britain made it into the top 100 list, down from 19 last year. More than a third of the top 100 are based in the US.
Vice-chancellors and commentators voiced concern that, without an increase in investment, Britain’s standing as a first-class destination for higher education could be under threat.
Wendy Piatt, director-general of the Russell Group of leading universities, said that its members were performing well against international rivals, adding: “The table reflects the growing strength of our major competitors – particularly the US institutions – which benefit from much higher levels of investment than UK universities.
“Without increased investment there is a real danger that the UK’s success will not be sustained.
“As a result of huge investment in higher education and science in recent years, China already looks set to overtake the UK very soon in terms of total research publications, and its universities have been steadily climbing up international league tables.”
The Times Higher Education-QS World University Rankings had 29 British universities in the top 200, one fewer than last year. Of these, 22 had slipped down the rankings. The rise of Asian institutions is reflected in the inclusion of nine of them within the top 50, including three based in Hong Kong. Two new entrants this year are Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Seoul National University.
A spokesman for Quacquarelli Symonds, which conducted the research, said that its findings also reflected the higher profile of technology-based universities.
Ann Mroz, the editor of Times Higher Education, said: “UK universities are very clearly among the world’s best and have maintained good positions in the rankings this year.
“But the fact that Cambridge and Oxford have slipped down the top ten and that US universities have cemented their dominance among the world’s elite, at the UK’s expense, raises key questions about the future funding of the sector.
“As a percentage of gross domestic product, the US spends more than twice as much on its universities as the UK does.”
The rankings – which are now in their fifth year – are based on surveys of academics and graduate employers about which they consider the best universities in their fields, the ratio of students to academics, the proportion of overseas students and staff at each university, and the number of times research by each university’s academics is quoted in other journals.
UK institutions in the world’s top 200
3 (2) University of Cambridge
4 (2) University of Oxford
6 (5) Imperial College London
7 (9) University College London
22 (24) King’s College London
23 (23) University of Edinburgh
29 (30) University of Manchester
32 (37) University of Bristol
66 (59) London School of Economics and Political Science
69 (57) University of Warwick
73 (83) University of Glasgow
75 (65) University of Birmingham
76 (68) University of Sheffield
81 (74) University of York
83 (76) University of St Andrews
86 (70) University of Nottingham
99 (80) University of Southampton
104 (80) University of Leeds
122 (109) Durham University
130 (121) University of Sussex
133 (99) Cardiff University
133 (101) University of Liverpool
152 (145) University of Bath
153 (137) University of Aberdeen
160 (149) Queen Mary, University of London
162 (129) Newcastle University
170 (147) University of Lancaster
177 (185) University of Leicester
194 (180) University of Reading
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
|
|
|
|
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Manchester most certainly DOES NOT deserves its place! It may be big thanks to the merger with UMIST but the ranking is not indicative of quality teaching or indeed, research. I've studied at both UCL and Bath and I fail to see why UCL is placed so far ahead of Bristol, Bath & St. Andrews.
Name withheld, Oxford,
Agree with Thom, WHERE'S EXETER?!!
Helen, London,
Where the bloody hell is Exeter University?! Outrageous! 'It's probably the best University in the world!'
Thom Yorke, Falmouth,
This is a biased ranking... Pitt above Penn state.. NEVER.
Ben, Pittsburgh, USA
Unsurprising, really, considering how little the UK Government seems to value its educational institutions, or at the very least takes them for granted. UK universities will not remain at the top of the table unless they're given the resources they need to do so.
Matt, Edinburgh, UK
Manchester most definitely deserves its place there.
corallie, london, england
Jack in Seattle, Bush attended Yale and Harvard when it was still possible to be admitted solely on the strength of family connections. That changed in the late 60's. I attended Yale years later, and it offered the richest, most vital intellectual environment I've ever encountered.
Lili, Chicago, USA
Having been to several UK universites, I can be sure that Manchester does not nearly offer the same quality of education as York or Bristol. Plus US universites are not nearly as focused as UK ones, with the Major and Minor system. I question what the journals were and the UK/US ratio of employers
Matt, UK,
Having attended colleges in both the U.S. and the U.K., the best -- at virtually every level -- university I spent time at was the University of Bristol (Now internationally rated #32). It's a shame that the Brits obsess over the same handful of top schools ...
Robert, Houston, USA
This ranking is not about teaching or the student experience as Farrukh suggests, 40% peer review 20% staff ratio. Both research driven . No marks for what students think. Hence the Redbricks still do well on this though they do embassingly on the National Student Survey.
Andy, Loughborough, UK
The ranking could not serious. University of Hong Kong ranks ahead of UCLA and UC Berkeley? They must interview a lot of employers in Hong Kong to get that ranking. The methodology is based too much on subjective interviews. The methodoly is more appropriate for world K-12 school ranking.
josh, Pittsburgh, USA
I think it is the teaching enviroment that matters the most. American universities have a more friendly enviroment towards foreigner while the same cannot be said for British institutions.
Keith, Chicago,
When the Labour government wants these universities to adopt social engineering by forcing them to accept students from a working class background even if they don't merit admission, what do you expect?
Shamer Williams, Cardiff,
It is not always about money. Harvard actually pays its postdoctoral research scientists less than most British instituitions. However it will continue to attract the best researchers because it is the finest and most prestigious research university. This cycle will maintain its top position.
David Lea-Smith, Edinburgh, U.K.
Recent rankings have done severe injustice to a number of universities in Britain, using citation scores used heavily in physical sciences.
LSE receives a LUDICROUSLY low position because it does not teach physical sciences, but it should be placed comfortably in the top 20. Shame on THEM!
Andrew, London, UK
What has happened to Queen's University,Belfast? Years ago it was considered quite superior to many of those listed in the first 200.
Dr David Swan, Melbourne, Australia
Of course the world standing of UK universities is in decline, this government's shortsighted funding cuts have ensured that the next generation of brilliant academics are all choosing to study abroad. Ludicrously low numbers of grants for Phd study are now available, its a national disgrace.
Sarah, London,
Let's put things in perspective.
George Bush received a BA from Yale and a MBA from Harvard.
Considering that, just how educational can a degree from those supposedly top-notch institutions be.
Jack, Seattle , USA
I agree with Jack, UK universities need to increase financial aid to international students. The high exchange rate of the pound makes studying in the UK way to expensive.
Cameron, Bridgetown, Barbados
It's all about money and, unfortunately, Americans' willingness to invest in HE while Britons still believe it should be free. One big reason why American uni's are ahead in funding is Alumni endowments. Brit uni's get nothing because there's no collective pride in them from athletic program's, etc
Matt Excell, London,
Go Reading!!!!
Andy, Limassol, Cyprus
UK would have to increase financial aid to foreign students if they want to attract more international students. Although they boast that they provide one of the best education in the world and that schools around the world are familiar with A-levels, no one in my place have ever heard of them befor
Jack, Jacksonville, Minnesota
Research capability does not equate to teaching ability. Those at the top have been banging on the last few years on how they will make Manchester a world leading institution through research, which they've done - at the expense of teaching, which is near abysmal. Remember this when applying to unis
Howard, Manchester,
The Govt have got the wrong approach. Uni shld be open to all with the intellectual capacity to benefit from it. Mandating a 'quota' of lower income students damages our universities. If bright students are from poorer backgrounds then fund them properly with no debt. Thats wht puts them off.
Alan, Bristol, UK
Many surprises here.Some British universities are ranked higher in international than national ranking.Much depends on ,what do you measure. If attracting overseas students is a criteria most British universities particulaly the best ones will always score low for variety of reasons.
mohidin, wakefield, uk
Perhaps Oxford & Cambridge should start charging the same tuition as the U.S institutions? At least in the UK parents don't have to begin saving for a University education when their child is born which frequently happens here in the U.S due to the immense costs associated with attending college.
zac, nyc,
It depends what you are studying, in what language and at what level e.g. the sagas; liverworts; waiata; A span bridges. The Times list and its Englisch ueber alles is as rational as ranking characters in books.
Mark Collet, Rotorua, New Zealand
I'm a graduate of KCL, and even I must say, surely LSE doesn't deserve such a low ranking, especially when compared to the universities ranked above, bar Oxbridge...
Carissa, Hong Kong, China
Farrukh may be right. But Farrukh should also look to the response posted. Way to go- dumb down the analysis of a complex issue.
naylor, Bloomington, USA
The universities should be for the cream of the educational minds,not dumed down so all can have a prize. We will continue to suffer on the international front until Labour are banished to the scrap heap and all their fat cats in local government with them.
Victor T Radford, Oldham, England
Having worked on a telephone campaign for a Cambridge College, it is obvious to see the decreased level of support old members (alumni) will provide in the UK.
Although 2/3 will give, more investment is needed from ex-students at ALL universities to ensure continued success for UK institutions.
Dan, Cambridge, UK
You can blame widely aailable cheap alcohol, more drunk teenagers, the general dumbing down of a once great nation.
Farrukh, Woking,