Clare Francis
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
THOUSANDS of buy-to-let investors face the prospect of negative equity in the latest sign that some parts of the housing market are looking shaky.
New-build flats in cities such as Nottingham, Birmingham and Leeds, which have been highly popular with landlords, are selling for as much as 35% less than their value just a year ago.
Buy-to-let investors who have not built up much equity may therefore have mortgages worth more than their properties – so-called negative equity, which has not been seen in Britain since the recession of the 1990s.
Estate agents report more landlords needing to sell because they can’t find tenants, or because interest-rate rises mean their rental income no longer covers their mortgage repayments.
Harry Dhaliwal at Belvoir Lettings in Manchester said: “I have landlords crying on the phone to me regularly. They are being forced to sell but because so many developments are still being built, they are struggling to find buyers.”
We offer a survival guide for landlords who are struggling.
Don’t panic if you’re in it for the long term . . .
While landlords who have bought new-builds are undoubtedly feeling real pain, experts said the market as a whole remains stable. House prices are expected to slow and possibly stagnate for several years, but analysts are not expecting prices to fall through the floor.
Most landlords are sitting on significant equity because prices have risen so strongly in recent years, so even if values did fall back over the next few years, most would still make a profit.
Advisers recommend that investors who do not need to sell should sit out any property slow-down, especially as there could be a silver lining: rental demand is expected to go up as first-time buyers who are priced out of the market opt to rent instead.
Rents have risen by an average of 7% over the past 12 months, their strongest for 15 months, according to Paragon.
. . . but some should sell
Some landlords are paying more for their mortgage then they are getting in rent, following five rate rises since August 2006.
This isn’t necessarily a problem for those with surpluses on other properties. Others are happy to cover the losses from savings because they are investing for long-term capital growth. But there are some who can’t afford to take the hit.
Philip Stewardson at Stewardson Developments, a property company in the West Midlands, said: “If there is no way your rental income will cover your mortgage then my advice is to get out now, particularly if you bought a new-build.
Remortgage to ” ease the pain
Landlords coming to the end of their mortgage deals should look to remortgage to avoid a steep increase in payments.
In 2005, Clydesdale Bank had a two-year fixed rate of 4.85%, which was popular with investors, according to John Charcol. Someone with a £150,000 inter-est-only mortgage who is coming to the end of that deal will see their payments jump from £606 a month to £969 if they move on to Clydesdale’s standard variable rate of 7.75%.
Stroud & Swindon has a two-year fix at 6.25%, with a £944 arrangement fee. The payments on a £150,000 interest-only loan would be £786 a month.
Watch for tougher lending
Some buy-to-let lenders have been tightening their criteria following the credit crunch. Gmac, for example, will now only lend up to 75% of a property’s value on new-builds completed in the last two years – down from 85%.
Investors whose property has fallen in value since they bought may no longer have enough equity to qualify for a mortgage with a different lender, although they could ask their existing lender for a better deal.
Turn to your main home
If you need more equity in your rental property to get a good mortgage deal but don’t have enough savings to pay off some of the mortgage, you could consider releasing money from your main home and use it to reduce the mortgage on the buy-to-let.
Go interest only
Buy-to-let borrowers get tax relief on their mortgage interest payments. To maximise the tax break, it is advisable to go for an interest-only rather than a repayment loan. Mortgage payments will also be lower.
Someone borrowing £100,000 over 25 years at 6% would pay £500 a month on an interest-only basis. If they received £850 a month in rent, the tax bill would be £1,680 a year, assuming they are a higher rate taxpayer. If the borrower had a £100,000 repayment mortgage, however, the tax bill after 20 years would be £3,207 a year – £1,527 a year more.
Defer capital-gains tax . . .
Most buy-to-let investors will benefit from a lower rate of capital gains tax (CGT) when the rules are changed next April. If you need to sell now, you could defer paying CGT by rolling profits into an enterprise investment scheme (EIS).
The CGT must be paid eventually, but if you sell your EIS shares over several years, using your CGT allowance each time, you may be able to avoid the tax or at least get the lower rate.
. . . or minimise your CGT liability If you are married, it is worth transferring half of the property into your spouse’s name before you sell to use both CGT allowances. This means £18,400 of the gain will be tax-free.
If you have lived in the property you rent out, you would not be liable for CGT for those years or for the last three years of ownership. You can also claim lettings relief worth £40,000 per owner. If you sell a property after seven years, having lived in it for three, CGT would only be paid on one year’s profits.
EXPERIENCED INVESTOR NEVER BORROWS MORE THAN 80%
CHRIS BROGAN is director of property firm Sell Quick. He owns several hundred properties but steers clear of new builds, having lost money on apartments he bought off-plan in 2003.
Brogan, 32, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, seen here with Melanie and their one-year-old son Finley, said: ‘All too often new builds are overvalued and overhyped.
‘I’ve been receiving an increasing number of inquiries from buy-to-let investors wanting to offload properties they bought off-plan but there are too many on the market to make them a viable investment.
‘I look for properties that I know I’m going to be able to rent out easily and where I will have an equity stake of at least 20%. In some instances I’m happy to take a loss on the rental income.’
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If you buy the right property at a right price you will not lose. if you are asking yourself - but how do I know? Then BTL, or property investing, is not for you. Know your market, both house prices and rental prices.
Never touch new built, even if the developer is offering you 50% discount!!! Most of the new built is not only overpriced but also of a significanlty poorer quality than the old stock.
Price correction might happen, price rises might moderate, but thats about it. There are too many people waiting to buy - FTB's, BTL's, international investors, Poles that have settled in the UK - and the stock is limited!!!
George, Newbury,
'Buy to Let' cannot be solely blamed for the rising prices of housing stock in the UK. There are many factors that push up house prices including the relative demand for housing.
In many cases private investors are letting their houses to the DSS so that people who cannot afford to rent or buy can still have decent housing and those letting to the private markets do not see the housing market as a short term investment which should not create short term speculation.
In the UK we have a relatively high ratio of homeowners versus other European Countries such as Germany where only 42% of Germans own their own homes as opposed to rent and in South Africa average salaries in some rural areas are around 10,000 rand versus average house prices of 1.5m rand - food for thought for people griping about not being able to afford their own house...
Emma, London, UK
""The next problem will be that rents now shoot up, and all the people who could not afford to buy cannot afford to rent.""
What Gallius fails to understand is that if it was not for buy to let, property prices would not be so high in the first place due to speculation, allowing first time buyers to get on the ladder. Buy to let deserves whats coming, and believe me IT IS COMING IN SHOVEL LOADS...!!!!
Nikolas Bartley, Burgess Hill, West Sussex
"Buy-to-let borrowers get tax relief on their mortgage interest payments. To maximise the tax break, it is advisable to go for an interest-only rather than a repayment loan. Mortgage payments will also be lower." so you save 30K on tax but you still have the outstanding capital on your property - doesn't seem like a saving in that case you seems to be 70K worse off at the end of 20 years on your 100K mortgage
meister, london,
Nothing wrong with buy to let, and all this hysteria is mostly from the have ânotsâ and not from the have âdonesâ. Anything long term in the range 10 to 15 years is safe, anyone who was stupid enough to believe they could earn a fortune year after year was dreaming. The next problem will be that rents now shoot up, and all the people who could not afford to buy cannot afford to rent. One of the ideas behind buy to let was that it would make more housing available to live in and to rent, and it certainly did that, and led to many homes which would otherwise remained unsold and
un-renovated having a new lease of life. Nobody seems to realise how much hard work is involved in buy to let, tax and legislation to provide safe housing, and how expensive it can be, and if people have the guts to invest in something then why is the whole world on a downer on them because they might make a profit for risking their money and having sleepless nights.
gallius dean, london, england
Buy to let is a partial consequence of our parlous pensions in this country. You can have every sypathy for people who see that property is the only thing that seems to consistently go up in value, is solid in the form of bricks and mortar and is more or less sheilded from the attentions of voracious financial advisors, poor investment returns, bancrupt company schemes and the government in the guise of Mr. Brown removing the tax exeptions on pension income. These unfortunate people have jumped on the bandwaggon, only to have the market go bad on them. The only way now is to bail out as quickly as possible and try something else, because things look very bad now as the government is determined to increase supply by building all these houses and all those people who have struggled to get on the housing ladder at fancy earnings multiples have disappeared becase of the tightening loan market.
Diddly Do, Liverpool,
Want to know what the future is for buy to let
http://www.propertyhawk.co.uk/index.php?page=magazine&id=165
chris, nottingham,
Without sounding to heartless or harsh, nothing would make me happier than to see these greedy landlords lose all the money they have made and then some!!
James, Bristol, Bristol
80% gearing may, actually, be OK for a professional who has gained the experience and developed his instincts. For a newcomer even 70% can be deadly high.
Jim Sommers, Dorset,
So much jealousy, so much bitterness. Oh dear.
Elena, London, London
Maybe it's time to give the lawyers the chance to get rich quick. Now that BTL = Buy to Lose there must be an opportunity to sue those estate agents and investment advisers etc who told you that buying to let was a guaranteed route to riches. Prospective claimants and the agents etc who might be sued, go to your nearest library, find a book on tort or professional negligence and look up the Hedley Byrne v Heller principle.
Clint, Staffs, UK
haaa haaa haa. Those greedy piggies who have priced first time buyers out of the market are finally to get their just desserts!
bob burton, southampton, england
Good God! this is frightening stuff - I'm just glad I was sensibly enough not to jump on the 'greed is good' bandwagon.
Ian, London, England
The problem is that there are no free lunches. Gearing buy to let properties is inherently risky. I have no sympathy for those who have bought at the wrong time thinking they would get rich quick. My advice is cut your losses and get out quick.
Holding out for higher rents is not good advice as we enter the next recession driven by the credit crunch. Who will be able to affgord higher rents?
I think that 80% gearing (debt level) is still relatively high and around 60 to 70% would be more sensible. By the way what is the point of taking a loss on rental income in a falling market?
david barker, maidstone,
mmmmmmm......
`I have landlords crying on the phone to me regularly. They are being forced to sell but because so many developments are still being built, they are struggling to find buyers.â
The thing that should make him sad is if he is forced into a series of 6 month assured shorthold lets as a consequence of losing his money.....
Pete Balchin, Solicitor , Bristol, UK
This is all good advice ... don't let your Loan to Value go to high, take a long term investment horizon, minimize tax, manage your mortgage book, plan for a 15% drop etc. etc.
This is all incredibly basic stuff, and it's amazing how it's been forgotten with all the "new paradigm, " touting of property "experts. " Remember, if your rent doesn't cover your mortgage you are a pure speculator on capital gains. If you do this in an illiquid bubbling asset market, you will get exactly what you deserve.
Bob Dawes, London, London
"THOUSANDS of buy-to-let investors face the prospect of negative equity..."
Ha, ha, ha.
...
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, HA, HA, HAAA!!!
Chris, London,