Steven Swinford and Robert Watts
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
Local authorities poured almost £100m into Icelandic banks for nine months after being warned about the risks of investing in them.
Town hall leaders have claimed that they were told of the dangers only a few weeks ago, leaving them with little time to react.
The councils were told months ago that the banks were being downgraded by credit rating agencies because of fears about their stability, but they still invested another £93m until last Monday when the main Icelandic banks were nationalised.
It is unclear what will now happen to the councils’ £1 billion investments.
Big investors included Dorset county council, which made six loans worth £28.1m to the Landsbanki bank, and Heritable, its UK subsidiary, between April and August. Norfolk county council invested £17.5m this year, including a £5m loan to Glitnir, another bank, on March 20.
The details emerged yesterday as a delegation from the Treasury went to Reykjavik. It made what it called “significant progress” in talks with the Icelandic authorities on accelerating payouts to individual British savers who have an estimated £1 billion in Icesave, a subsidiary of the now nationalised Landsbanki.
Officials expect payments to private savers to begin in about a month. The move does not affect investments made by councils, businesses, charities and other organisations.
Councils have been lobbying the government for help in recovering their money from Iceland, but their position will be harmed by the news that they missed the warnings.
On January 30, Moody’s Investors Service warned that it was planning to cut ratings on the main Icelandic banks. It downgraded the biggest, Glitnir, Kaupthing and Landsbanki, from C to C-minus a month later. In April, Standard & Poor’s raised concerns about Glitnir, downgrading it from A-minus to BBB-plus, “the lowest rating at the time of any western European bank”.
Councils claim that they were unaware of the warnings by Moody’s and S&P, following instead the more optimistic ratings by Fitch.
However, Mark Horsfield, director of Arlingclose, an adviser to the public sector, said he had long been telling the 45 councils on the firm’s books of the dangers: “These banks have been getting steadily worse for quite a long time.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Np
If you understood cash flow you would realise that the cash is available because of timing differences between receipts and payments.
It is not cash that they (councils, universities, private companies, police authorities, charities etc) hold on to for the sake of it.
Robert, Keele, UK
........and in the meantime they quite rightly invest the cash to earn a return for the tax payer, subscribers, shareholders etc.
What are they supposed to do? Put it under the bed?
Let the facts emerge before you make irrational, ill informed judgments please.
Robert, Keele, UK
I think that everyone needs to let the facts emerge before anyone is put to the sword.
Hindsight and speculation spring to mind.
Robert, Keele,
I don't care what the excuses are, this is gross incompetance.
Those responsible must be sacked.
What the hell are they doing, building up this money when we could have had rebates.
Np, England, UK (while we have food)
Any prudent council needs to keep some of its money in reserve for paying for things that happen at unexpected times. A council may also be planning a major development and saving money to pay for it. It makes sense for a council to put its money where it will earn interest.
PeterWD, Lisburn, UK
Mr. Paul C from Harlow: With regards to 'those who caused this mess", are you including the people who took out mortgages for more than they could afford? Also all the 'buy-to let' owners who've leveraged property on property without any real capital? Afterall, the debt-fuelled boom caused the mess
Roger, Norwich, England
Treasurers and Chief Execs. of councils have NO excuse to say they followed ratings by Fitch. They should have monitored more than one. Anyone with professional qualifications should have them revoked. Council leaders should be sacked, & sent to Guantanamo Bay with the Bankers who caused this mess!
Paul C, Harlow, England
Why are these councils investing public funds when these money should be return to the rate payer or reinvested in front line services?
dominik, london,
The leaders and Finacial teams at these councils should be sacked at the very least.
But I think even criminal proceedings should be looked into seeing it is our (public) money they have lost.
Dave, London, UK