Sam Knight
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland

10 bizarre sights in Google Street View
The latest phase in Google's mission to organise the world's information — thousands of street-level photographs of major American cities — has raised questions that the search engine is invading people's privacy.
The new feature on Google's map service, called "Street View", was unveiled this week at the Where 2.0 conference in San Jose, California, but within hours of the photographs of downtown San Francisco and New York hitting the internet, bloggers were posting images of people, their faces visible, being arrested, sunbathing and urinating in public.
Posting on the website, Boing Boing, one resident of Berkeley, California, Mary Kalin-Casey said that she decided to see what her flat looked like on the site and was surprised to come across a highly detailed photograph of her cat, Monty, sitting in the window.
"I'm all for mapping, but this feature literally gives me the shakes," she wrote. "I feel like I need to close all my curtains now. I'm going to look into whether it's possible for a person to have pictures of their home removed from Google Maps. Meanwhile, I'm happy to show bb readers the photo in the interest of illustrating creepy privacy violations. Heck, the whole world can see him anyway."
The photographs, provided to Google by Immersive Media, an imaging company headquartered in Calgary, Canada, have prompted unease in part because there is no apparent attempt to blur people's faces or number plates or obscure what is happening inside private properties along the route taken by the car-mounted cameras.
Images collected in just two days by the online magazine, Wired.com, show pedestrians picking their noses, police attending a fatality, a man climbing into an apartment block and a possible drug deal. There are also images taken inside New York's tunnels, a practice frowned on by the authorities since the September 11 attacks.
Google has defended the extent of the images, saying they are no different to what people see in their daily lives, and claiming that the website is equipped with "easily accessible tools for flagging inappropriate or sensitive imagery for review and removal". The company also said it approached anonymous shelters such as women's refuge centres and drug treatment facilites before the launch of the service and has removed them from the maps.
A spokeswoman in London said the company would not comment on whether it planned to extend the service across the US or to Britain, but promised respond quickly to parents, for instance, who called with concerns about the publication of images of their children on the street.
"We totally understand those concerns and we hope we've made it easy for people to register them," she said. "From the bottom up, we've taken those concerns into consideration."
But the assurances have failed to mollify privacy advocates. Simon Davies, the director of Privacy International, the London-based surveillance watchdog, criticised Google for failing to consult widely before launching their newest tool.
"The cultural imperative within Google is anti-privacy, no matter what they say," he said. "This is just the latest in a litany of privacy invasions by Google, which they justify by claiming openness as an excuse."
He added: "There is going to be long, bloody battle with Google one day unless they take the privacy message on board. Someone is going to get hurt, lose their job or their marriage because of this product and what will Google say? Buyer beware? But we have no choice."
"Google has to stop and take a breath and become a responsible member of the corporate community. I'm flabbergasted."
Despite reservations, the legal side of the issue is more forgiving. Privacy law in both the US and the UK broadly allows the publication of photographs in public places and Duncan Lamont, a media law partner at Charles Russell, said that the service would be unlikely to face major legal difficulties if it was extended to Britain. "If I was Google in England, I would be pretty relaxed," he said.
Mr Lamont said the sorts of images that people could contest under England's privacy laws would be those of children and those that showed intimate acts in private places, such as sunbathing naked in one's garden.
Otherwise he said the company could be in breach of Britain's data protection laws by inadvertently revealing private information such as visits to a brothel or hospital. "They would have to be unlucky," he said. "But I bet somewhere along the line they will be unlucky."
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I am in Spokane Wa, and I freaked the first time I saw it. but seriously, all it is like is if someone was driving down the street-that's all you see. It's really no biggie and the car they used has a big deal on the top so it's not like you can't see it go down the street
Tyrone, Spokane , USA
tbock in Denver, you will most likely get the type of society you expect to live in by your acquiescence, and personally I think your attitude and those of the others with a "if you're not doing anything wrong, what's the problem?" mindset are despicable.
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.
Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892â1984)
Ron Thomas, Estes Park, Colorado, USA
They don't even have a tripod, it's a car passing by. It's like if you drove on the street yourself with everyone doing there everyday thing. It's not like they are constantly going to pass by your house for new pictures it was a one time deal. What do you have to hide.
Jeff, Burlington, Kentucky
This is not big brother. It is not a problem. If there's a picture of you picking your nose or worse then maybe you shouldn't pick your nose in public!
Ian, blackburn, lancs
Hmmm......big question.....some snaps.... some public places....why r u concerned? Photos of a cat or photos of people are usually seen at calendars that gets sold for some bucks......nobody question the privacy of the people when someone posts photos of golden gate bridge in picasa/flickr along with people walking on it......these are also viewable in public....nobody raises any question of privacy when paparazzi photographs hollywood celebs and posts them in media, media publishes in page 20 and people have a curious look at that...google streetview is an important tool if I am planning a LA/NY trip...why would somebody be in a compromising situation in a public place when they are really concerned about their privacy?
just_another_idea, San Francisco, CA
Its funny to see all the supporters, most are from places that are not on the maps. Just wait untl your family and friends are smattered all over the web with degrading and defaming comments. If someone were to come to your house, set up a tripod in front and take pictures I am sure you would want to know what the heck is going on. If you were told "oh, were just going to put the on the web for the world to see, and by the way "Smile!" I am sure you would have a big problem with it. I urge local opposition to write their congressmen.
Citizen, Bay Area, California
Privacy is a concern... but i love it!
I found a site with lots of Street View links.
http://topstreetviews.com/
Byron, roisten, Miz
The photos might be old, the postings might be removable, but it's still intrusive. The burden should never be on the private citizen to remove photographs of their children or their daily lives from the public forum. This is irresponsible and google should listen up. Boycott.
fran, washington, dc
Google should be renamed into Ogling''.
Of course there is a difference between a scene in a public place seen by one or a few persons vs by (potentially) the whole world.
I was a Google fan (vs Microsoft), but I am beginning to believe MS has a few more scruples (though not many) left that Google, at least in the privacy area.
Why don't we start videoing the Google founders and their families continuously (in public places only of course) and put this on the web?
Maybe then they would finally begin to understand what they are doing.
John, london, UK
We're not talking live pictures here, just what was viewable from the road at one particular instant. but still very useful to get an idea as to the locale if planning a trip.
Gwyn Evans, Lydney, UK
I thought Google was one of the big corporate sponsors of the Democratic Party in the U.S.A
Surely the Dems. couldn't support this latest invasion of privacy or do ethics disappear in favour of donations?
grant watt, Glenning Valley, australia
I don't see any justification for this kind of "entertainment",the ACLU should intervene,and sue Google to stop this infringement on individuals right to privacy.I wonder if there is a lawyer, somewhere ,pondering the idea of challenging Google in court over this.
Sam, Dallas, USA
Looks like there's another big brother in our lives and it won't be surprising if all the data they are collecting is going to the one entity that's been desperately trying to do something like this - the goverment. Given Google's past complicity with the government agencies, this could be just another way of getting their work done using the brand image of a successful "public" company. I think the time for a "Google boycott" has come and all sensible folks should join the effort rather than wait until it is too late! Open your eyes and realise that everything Goolge does need not to be "good". Their actions are guided by monetary gains and lately they've been bordering on the dangerous. I hope our efforts are not too late to stop an Orweillian society!
Ajith J, Cambridge,
this is crazy.
luis valles, alburquerque, new mexico
I've lived here my whole life, and I can honestly say I've probably appeared in hundreds of strangers' photographs. I think it's a little crazy to worry about being snapped in public, but if people can look right into apartment windows, we've got ourselves a problem.
Paul, Niagara Falls, Canada
4. A girl bending over, and two guys watching her...
5. Ambulance driver stops for a sandwich
How entertaining...
Can't wait for "guy reads newspaper in garden" and "truck driver with hands on steering wheel"
Ronnie, Paris,
Freedom is already more of an illusion than you realize but at the same time quit worrying about who's watching and get on with LIVING !!
Christine, Louisville KY, USA
So if I go on vacation and I take pictures of me standing next to Niagara Falls and someone else ends up in the picture and I post them on my website, is that an invasion of privacy? No!! Geez.. By the time anybody figures out who that person is, they will have been long gone. I think it is kinda neat. If you are on a public street it is just that PUBLIC. If you are so worried about being busted then don't be in the PUBLIC in the first place.
Patricia, Sarasota , FL
What's so scary about this? This is nothing more than what you would see if you drove down these streets yourself. There's no invasion of privacy since all these pictures were taken from public streets.
Privacy is over rated. If I want to do something in private I can just shut my curtains. Get over it you guppies.
Scott Hodgins, Sudbury, Ontario
Oh, please... going on vacation? These images are not going to be updated all that often. They are already oId when they are posted. They are no where near real time. This is really just a bunch of media hype, it will be usefull when goring to an unfamiliar area .
Joe, South Bend,
Public streets aren't private places, and therefore you can have no expectation of privacy. Anyone who expects any privacy in a public space is grandly deluded.
Geren W. Mortensen, Jr., Columbia, Maryland
What is it with Google? They seem hellbent on destroying any kind of privacy we have. Is Google owned by the US government? These actions are reckless, innapropriate and just plain wrong. Not to mention annoyingly unintersting.
Jennifer Hynes, Plymouth, England
It is amazing to me how many are so ready to give up privacy for the sake of technology or in the name of national security. Wake up people, democracy is dying and none of you give a dam.
If you think having camera's watching your every move is living in a free society I have news for you, Big Brother will be watching and you are soon going to find "freedom" is an illusion.
T, Vancouver, Canad
I find it kind of exciting that millions of ppl around the world will see me making love to my fiance in the back garden.
Fred Denver, Malibu, California
It is wrong for google to take street views in any small town or anywhere that people reside . Privacy issues are of utmost concern. What happens when google view shows people leaving home on vacation or leaving work? The dangers far out- weigh the benefits to business. This is a horrible invasion of privacy and poses great danger to the population as a whole.
Crystal , benicia,
I thought it was mapping software! That would be great for anyone who needs it. But why must someone be able to see faces and address numbers? That would be rediculous; however, such a function in a separate module available to the police would be better than the security cameras that ALMOST show the suspect of a crime such as assault, kidnapping, etc.
Guy Peterson, Phoenix, Arizona
It always cracks me up that the people who are concerned about privacy point out the illegal or immoral acts that people do.
"Someone is going to get hurt, lose their job or their marriage because of this product and what will Google say?"
If the government, or Google wants to watch what I do or tap my phone, go ahead... Plan to be bored.
tbock, Denver, CO
Talk about "Big Brother"...take a look at this service now available in Google Maps.
Amir Bendayan, Miami, FL