Graham Spiers
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Classic Times Fantasy Football is back. Sign up for £3 a team or 3 for £6
Previous British prime ministers as keen to please as John Major and Tony Blair got their fingers burnt when choosing to meddle in football, and now it is Gordon Brown’s turn. As if the embattled son of Kirkcaldy — and Raith Rovers fan — does not have enough on his plate, Brown has caused apoplexy among the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland football associations by urging that a Team GB in football be in place for the 2012 London Olympics.
Looking on from the touchlines, you may think it is a peculiar stir that has broken out. Great Britain have just had a momentous Olympics in Beijing, and foremost among them has been the triple gold medal-winning cyclist, Chris Hoy, a Scot, who has proudly worn GB on his vest. So what, actually, is the big deal about Brown insisting that Britain, the cradle of football, should have a team in place in four years’ time?
You would know the answer to that question if you watched the steam rising from the head offices of the Scottish FA (SFA) or the FA of Wales (FAW). Indeed, the finest piece of excoriation available after Brown’s humble suggestion came from Peter Rees, the president of the FAW, who said: “It will be a cold day in hell before any Wales player plays for Team GB at the Olympics.”
Gordon Smith, an otherwise open-minded chief executive of the SFA, is of a like mind. “In principle, we are opposed to it,” Smith told The Times yesterday. “The SFA wants nothing to do with a GB Olympic football team.”
Wading into the fray were two other figures yesterday, the first a political showman, the other an assured International Olympic Committee veteran, both taking diametrically opposite views.
Alex Salmond, the First Minister of Scotland, has reacted like a cuckolded husband at the very idea of Scottish footballers being asked to take part in a Team GB in 2012. “It is ridiculous, a major own goal by the Prime Minister,” Salmond said, foaming. “I am against it, the SFA are against it, the fans are against it, yet here is Brown trying to force it through.”
Sir Craig Reedie, a revered Scottish sports administrator, and member of the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games, was more sanguine. “It is going to happen — there will be a
GB football team at the 2012 Olympics and people better start getting used to the idea,” Reedie said.
What is at stake here, in truth, is self-preservation. The paranoia of the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish FAs amounts to this: if Britain is seen to be lumped together for football at the next Olympics, then what is to stop Fifa coming barging in and saying: “Right, you lot, that’s enough, pack up. From now on, we will just have a Great Britain Football Association and no other”? In essence, the SFA and others believe that a 2012 Britain football team would mean that their blazers would be just as well going on top of a bonfire as being put back in the closet.
Some believe that the siege mentality of the SFA and FAW is absurd, and that no such dissolution will take place because of a footballing Team GB. Sepp Blatter, the president of Fifa, has certainly not said as much, although Blatter’s rambling style often changes in tone, if rarely in length.
There is one further anxiety that troubles the four home football associations — including the FA — and that is almost a hangover from the days of the Raj. The vexed and sore subject of football’s International Board has long troubled the game’s administrators, especially if you hail from Africa, India or South America. The International Football Association Board (Ifab), to give it its full title, is the supreme law-making authority in the game. It is also, democratically, an absurdity, consisting of an eight-man board, four of which, by guarantee, are representatives of Britain’s four home nations, with the other four places representing the rest of Fifa’s 240-odd member nations.
If this is not a throwback to the age when Britain “owned” parts of the globe, then what is? The Ifab is a shocking anachronism, yet for the FA, the SFA, the FAW and the Northern Ireland FA, it provides much-cherished elitism. Twice a year the Ifab convenes, usually in some exotic hot-spot, and no one among the four home FAs wants to upset the cosy arrangement.
In football, ludicrously, Britain still rules the waves. It is this that is the real rub of that scoundrel, Brown, and his daft ideas.
Don’t anyone doubt that a 2012 Team GB would, in effect, be Team England. Barring a miraculous new harvest of talent, few Scots, Welsh or Northern Irish will figure. But that is a matter of pride. The rest of it, pure and simple, is politics.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I couldn't care less about an Olympic football team, but citing the potential loss of national teams seems far fetched to me. If it was to happen, would that imply the league structures of all countries would have to merge to support one national team?
That's never going to happen.
Ian Thomson, Houston, USA
Paul from Birningham: Notice that Palestine, not a fully sovereign nation either, is an IOC and FIFA member, because it's unrealistic to expect their sportspeople to want to represent Israel, and likewise unrealistic to think Israel wants to be represented by them. This is the same situation.
RMB, Stirling,
As a Scot I have very little interest in the Olympics.Scotland aren't there so whats the point.This whole argument could be academic by 2012 All the signs in Scotland are pointing toward the referendum taking place well before that so by the time 2012 comes around Scotland will be there as Scotland
Danny, Aberdeen, Scotland
The simple answer to this is to have a provisional Team GB squad, comprising fully of English players. So it would be the England U-23 squad in all but name, featuring 3 over-23 players. I am opposed to a mixed British team, but we must think of a way to enter an Olympic football team.
Michael, Kent,
I think a four way tournament is the perfect solution. Team GB would merely be the English choosing their players and a smattering of Celts to sit on the bench, which, considering that Scotland are 16th ranked in the world, and England only 2 places higher, would be a travesty.
stuart pollok, los angeles, USA
You can't have it both ways. Either you go on from now as Team GB or end the discussion here. Only because the olympics are being held in London there would be a Team GB. And at the next olympics it will seize to exist. I think that's offensive to nations who are serious about it.
Joris, Woerden, Holland
Although I disagree with football being an Olympic sport in the first place, the failure of us to find a way to compete is petty and daft.
I'd favour of a series of home internationals to see which of the 4 teams represent us in 2012 (rather than a mixed side). Cetainly not a forgone conclusion.
Mike, London, UK
Scotland here we go again, Small man syndrome, if it were'nt for Chris Hoy they would'nt be mouthing off. let them them have full independence let them have there own lottery, let them have there own politicians and taxes. were sick off hearing from this little province north of Berwick down hear.
Sean, Northampton,
Paul (Birmingham) - the UK is not a country, it is a multi-national state, comprising four countries. Outside England, this is well understood. You've been reading too much British imperialist propaganda! You will be telling the Scots that they are not allowed to leave the UK next.
Ian Campbell, W Horsley, England
I would have loved to see a GB football team in the 60's -80's.
It would have been excrutiatingly difficult to pick 11 players (would Best,Charlton and Law automatically be picked?)
Judged by today's standard of GB football we'd struggle to pick 11 good players.
Harris, Malmo, Sweden
Perhaps they should first consider calling the team it's correct name before they start trying to drag more sports under it's banner. Team UK perhaps or Team GB & NI, since Northern Ireland is not part of Great Britain.
Maebh, Reading,
the UK consists of 4 costituent countries, each with a football team. look it up!
Hedd Wyn John, Penybont, Cymru
Wales is a principality of the Kingdom of England, Scotland is its own Kingdom and NI is part of the province of Ulster all governed as The UK of GB & NI.
All have rights to our own nationality, however would like to see team GB for the olympics only, Fifa should have no say in politics!
David, Glasgow, UK
The Scots support the British Lions and Team GB. As an Englishman who has lived in Scotland for 30 years I am a firm believer that a GB team should enter the World Cup and Uefa tournaments...having 4 seats on the IFB thing is a joke....
Geoff, Helensburgh,
Dear PM, Whoever came up with this plan has no idea of what makes a British football fan tick. You would do well to get rid of this person and take your advice on the subject from someone that has actually seen a match. A Team GB for the Olympics opens the door to an unwanted Team GB for always.
Mark Shepherd, Lincoln, Lincs
How out of touch can a person be ?
Martin Briggs, Heversham, England
I'm English and I'll never support a Great Britain football team.
Will Scottish and Welsh football fans still be expected to boo God Save the Queen, as they do when the English and Northern Irish football teams use it as their anthem?
Gareth Young, Lewes, England
The separate FAs exist because we invented the game, the first "international" was between Scotland and England . But the makeup of ifab could be changed without having to deny the four countries their separate footballing existences. No football fans outside England would support a UK team anyway.
S. Turner, Fife, UK
Scotland, Wales, England and NI are not countries. They are provinces of the UK. So why should they get their own separate teams?
Paul, Birmingham, UK